Why Is Trump Defunding The Post Office?

Trump admits he is undermining USPS to make it harder to vote by mail This article is more than 1 year old The president says he opposes providing additional money to the postal service to help it deliver mail-in ballots

Why did Trump Block A funding boost for the post office?

“President Donald Trump said Thursday that he would block a funding boost for the U.S. Postal Service to handle an expected flood of mail-in ballots in coming weeks, admitting it’s part of a White House effort to limit Americans voting by mail and raising the chances of chaos surrounding the election in November.”

Why is Trump so interested in the postal service?

Trump has taken a keen interest in the Postal Service in recent months, installing a loyalist to head it. Democrats have accused him of doing this to stifle the ability of Americans to cast votes by mail. The Post’s Jacob Bogage has a great piece on the ins and outs of what’s been taking place there:

Does Trump want mail-in voting for the US Postal Service?

These maps indicate otherwise (CNN) President Donald Trump said Thursday that he opposes much-needed funding for the United States Postal Service because he doesn’t want to see it used for mail-in voting this November.

Why did Trump Block A funding boost for the post office?

“President Donald Trump said Thursday that he would block a funding boost for the U.S. Postal Service to handle an expected flood of mail-in ballots in coming weeks, admitting it’s part of a White House effort to limit Americans voting by mail and raising the chances of chaos surrounding the election in November.”

Does Trump want mail-in voting for the US Postal Service?

These maps indicate otherwise (CNN) President Donald Trump said Thursday that he opposes much-needed funding for the United States Postal Service because he doesn’t want to see it used for mail-in voting this November.

Trump admits he is undermining USPS to make it harder to vote by mail

On Thursday, Donald Trump revealed that he was opposed to increased financing for the United States Postal Service (USPS) in order to make it more difficult to distribute mail-in ballots during the election.Trump’s statements provide further proof for critics who claim that the president is attempting to suffocate the United States Postal Service in ahead of the November elections in order to aid his re-election effort.Trump stated on Thursday that legislative discussions for stimulus money had been slowed in part by Democratic plans to offer $3.6 billion in funding to states to handle elections and $25 billion in funding to the United States Postal Service, among other things.The president, who has wrongly claimed that massive mail-in voting will lead to fraud, has stated that it would be more difficult to vote by mail if the financing were not provided.

When asked about the funds, Trump stated, ″They need that money in order for the post office to run so that it can collect all of these millions and millions of ballots.″ Trump spoke with Maria Bartiromo, host of Fox Business’s Maria Bartiromo.″If they don’t obtain those two components, it implies that you won’t be able to have universal mail-in voting because they won’t be able to handle it,″ says the author.Congress has authorized just $400 million to assist states in conducting elections, a pittance of the $4 billion that the Brennan Center for Justice predicts would be required this year.Many election officials are trying to find out how they will conduct an election in which a record number of mail-in and in-person ballots is likely to be cast.The lack of money may already be having an impact; in Kentucky, the state’s chief election official stated last week that he did not favor increasing mail-in voting for the fall election because the state lacked the necessary infrastructure.The president’s remarks also come amid allegations that Louis DeJoy, the new postmaster general and a prominent Republican supporter, is implementing changes within the agency in order to purposefully slow down the delivery of letters and packages.

Significant mail delays have been reported in various locations across the country, and the Washington Post and other news organizations published internal USPS documents last month that stated there was a blanket ban on overtime and that workers were being instructed to leave mail behind if it would cause them to be delayed on their routes.Despite denying that there is a general prohibition on overtime, a spokesperson for the United States Postal Service did not respond to concerns regarding whether employees were being directed to leave the mail behind.Due to the unprecedented number of Americans expected to vote by mail this fall, a slower mail service could have a significant impact.

  • Many jurisdictions require a ballot to arrive at an election office by the deadline, regardless of when it was mailed, in order for it to be counted, which means that a slower mail service could have a significant impact.
  • Approximately 65,000 votes were invalidated during the 2020 primaries due to the fact that they were received too late.
  • In the event that we don’t come to an agreement, it means they won’t get the money.

As a result, they will be unable to implement universal mail-in voting.They just can’t take it any longer.The president described the event as ″a bit of a craziness.″ The president-spokesman, elect’s Andrew Bates, said in a statement that Trump was targeting the United States economy and democracy.Biden is the expected Democratic presidential contender.In order to deny Americans their fundamental right to vote safely during the most catastrophic public health crisis in more than a century, the president of the United States is sabotaging a basic service on which hundreds of millions of people rely, cutting a critical lifeline for rural economies and the delivery of medicines, according to the president.United States Postal Service officials have not said that they require more funds in order to distribute mail-in votes this autumn.

During a meeting of the United States Postal Service’s board of governors on Friday, DeJoy stated that the Postal Service ″has enough capacity to deliver all election mail safely and on schedule in line with our service standards,″ and that ″we will do so.″ During a separate interview conducted on Thursday, Larry Kudlow, the president’s top economic advisor, criticized efforts to make it simpler for members of Congress to vote for stimulus money.As he put it, ″so much of what the Democrats are asking for are basically far left wishlists.″ The right to vote, assistance to foreigners, and so forth.″That’s not our style of play.″

Separating Fact From Fiction On Trump And The Post Office – And Why It Matters

Examine some of the claims that have been made recently concerning Trump and the United States Postal Service, shall we?″Trump acknowledges that he is withholding funds from the Postal Service in order to weaken voting by mail.″ On August 13, 2020, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution published an article that was reproduced from the Los Angeles Times.“ As part of a White House effort to limit Americans’ ability to vote by mail, President Donald Trump said he would block a funding boost for the United States Postal Service to deal with an expected influx of mail-in ballots in the coming weeks.″It’s part of a White House effort to limit Americans’ ability to vote by mail, and it raises the possibility of chaos surrounding the election in November,″ Trump said.

This is based on an interview with Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business, which was subsequently quoted in greater detail by CNN.″They want $3.5 billion for something that will turn out to be a hoax; in other words, they want money for the upcoming elections.They want $3.5 trillion — billion dollars for mail-in votes, OK, universal mail-in ballots, $3.5 trillion — for mail-in votes, OK, universal mail-in ballots.Their demand for the Post Office is $25 billion, or billions of dollars.Now they require that money in order to keep the Post Office operational so that it can handle the millions and millions of ballots that are being cast….Now, if we don’t reach an agreement, it means they won’t receive the funds.

That implies they will be unable to implement universal mail-in voting; they will simply be unable to do so.So, you know, it’s kind of a bizarre situation.It’s a fascinating read.″ But what does Trump’s statement mean?

  • In his article, ″Trump refuses to give them that money — or include it in any sort of deal — because without it, there will be no ability for the people to cast more mail-in ballots, or — and this is extremely important — for election officials to effectively count them all,″ Chris Cillizza explains why.
  • Here are some extracts from another version of his opinions on the subject, which he delivered during a press briefing on August 13th: ″So, they want $25 billion, and they want — think about it: they want $3.5 billion in compensation.
  • Would you say that’s enough to pay the costs of the project?

I believe we could do it for less money, don’t you?I believe we could complete it for less money.Nonetheless, they demand $25 billion for the Post Office as a result of this….However, they voted against this law because they want radical-left agenda items that no reasonable person would support….And the bill isn’t going to pass because they don’t even want to speak about it because we can’t offer them the kinds of absurd things that they want that have nothing to do with the law in the first place!As a result, they are unable to participate in the universal mail-in voting since they lack the necessary funds.

As a result, I believe they are unable to complete the task.Right?” So, what exactly is Trump saying?Yes, it is largely incomprehensible — but it appears to be an effort at a bargaining posture rather than an admission of attempting to ″increase the likelihood of chaos.″ According to a Politico piece published today, ″House Democrats included $25 billion for the United States Postal Service in their coronavirus bill in May, as well as an additional $3.6 billion for election security money.″ When it came to postal service funding, the White House and Democratic leaders provisionally agreed to up to $10 billion, but that was reliant on the remainder of the agreement being finalized, which wasn’t on the horizon.″The Postal Service has warned 46 states that voters might be disenfranchised if mail-in votes are delayed,″ according to the Washington Post on August 14, 2020.

  • Ahead of the high-stakes presidential election, the United States Postal Service has sent comprehensive letters to 46 states and the District of Columbia, warning that it cannot ensure that all ballots cast by mail for the November election will reach in time to be tallied.″ “ According to the letters, even if voters fulfill all of their state’s election regulations, the speed with which the Postal Service delivers their mail-in ballots might prohibit them from casting their ballots this fall.
  • Reports of the letter-delivery delays stoke fears that the Post Office has become so chronically late that it is unable to handle the obligation of delivering ballots to voters and subsequently returning them to election officials, thereby ″disenfranchising″ voters (with the connotation that this is a deliberate act to deprive Americans of their vote).
  • However, the letters themselves lay out the expected delivery times plus allowance for contingencies, and whether a given state’s denial of voting rights Voters in Maine, for example, can obtain absentee votes as late as the third working day before the election, whereas in Montana, they can seek them as late as the day before the election, and so on.
  • From the article ″Wait, so what’s going on with the Post Office?″ published in the Chicago Tribune on August 15, 2020, which is a reprint of an Associated Press story, ″…
  • the United States Postal Service is compelled to pre-fund retirement for employees in a way that other businesses are not.″ Yes, we’ve gone through this previously – for a thorough explanation, check my April 14 article ″Post Office Pensions: Some Key Myths and Facts.″ The short version is that the Postal Service, like other private firms, is compelled to finance its pensions in advance of their retirement.

All private companies are also required to account for their obligations to provide retiree medical benefits, to the extent that they have made this commitment — which means that these liabilities appear on their balance sheet as debt, and the annual interest accrual on that debt appears on their income statement as expense, putting the Post Office in the same boat as its competitors in terms of its profit or loss for the year.However, because the Postal Service is essentially locked into providing retiree medical benefits in a way that is not true for its private competitors, it has been required to advance-fund those benefits.However, since 2009, the Postal Service has not actually been paying into the fund, ensuring that the on-paper ″funding requirement″ does not have an impact on its cash flow.Certainly, there are certain specific aspects of the rules that may be cited — a lower discount rate that increases their expense, for example — but the assertion that businesses are obligated to finance pensions for workers who have not yet been born is particularly egregiously incorrect.

″Although the Post Office has been losing money for years, supporters point out that it is a subsidized government service rather than a profit-maximizing business like FedEx or other competitors — which are not required to provide services everywhere at fixed costs — and that it is not under any obligation to do so.″ — the same piece from the Tribune/Associated Press.Yikes.Many of the challenges facing the United States Postal Service are not ones in which I claim to be an expert.How much financial assistance does it require for covid-related expenses, such as cleaning equipment or providing sick leave to employees?With firms such as Amazon, what kinds of deals should it be able to negotiate?

  • What is more likely: that the new postmaster general, Louis DeJoy, is skillfully repairing a broken institution, or that he is indifferent to the Post Office’s responsibilities to deliver the mail in a timely manner?
  • Is the Post Office’s inability to deliver mail-in ballots a proof that the Post Office is now newly mismanaged, or are we just now seeing and caring?
  • (As an unintentional data point, the first result of a simple web search returned an article from 2015 complaining about postal delays.) Observe that even when comparing the decade from 2010 to 2019, the volume of stamped ″single piece″ first-class mail had decreased by nearly half — from 28.9 billion in stamped mail in 2010 to 16.5 billion in 2019, while the volume of shipping/package mail had more than doubled, from 3.1 billion in 2010 to 6.2 billion in 2019, as noted above.
  1. In addition, our stamp costs appear to be on the lower end of the spectrum when compared to other nations — and, as the saying goes, you get what you pay for in life.
  2. (When compared to our $0.55, you’d pay a dollar in Germany and a little more in France for a postage stamp.
  3. Even more surprising than the typical allegations that ″it’s all because of an unjust pension obligation″ or the new theme that ″Trump is attempting to ruin the Post Office″ was that one line.
See also:  What Post Office Delivers To Me?

As previously said, ″advocates underline that it is a subsidized government service.″ On Thursday, I lamented that too many Americans, pundits, and politicians in particular want to ″have their cake and eat it too″ when it comes to Social Security, wanting to believe that they paid for their Social Security in full and fair while also calling for the wealthy to subsidize everyone else and tax increases to be immediately paid out in benefit hikes rather than used to fund future benefits.I was not alone in my lamentation.And I’m having the same problem over here.If this new idea of the Post Office has become common, that it is a ″supported government service″ rather than a quasi-private organization expected to bear its own expenses, then is a significant shift and one that needs to be discussed.Although there has always been an element of subsidy, the Post Office’s rates are structured in such a manner that city-dwellers must support country-dwellers by paying the same postage rates as their mail, despite the fact that their mail is cheaper to transport.

In fact, given that I live in an older suburb where postal carriers still walk from door to door, I’ve periodically pondered how much cross-subsidization my mail carrier’s route requires in comparison to the individuals a mile or two down the road who have at-the-street mailboxes served by mail trucks.However, as Americans, we have not traditionally thought of the Post Office as being subsidized.The Postal Service is now being treated as any other government agency by American (Democratic) politicians.

Take, for example, a letter from Speaker Pelosi and the House Democrats to Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, which was sent on August 12 and stated: ″The Postal Service provides critical services for the American people, delivering medicine to seniors, paychecks to workers, tax refunds to millions, and absentee ballots to voters.″ And, once again, the topic of whether the USPS’s stamp prices are just too cheap for the job at hand is never raised in any discussion of the postal service’s financial health.The fact that we have arrived at an agreement that mail delivery should be subsidized, rather than being entirely covered by the stamps we purchase, and that we are beginning to think of mail delivery as a sort of ″social insurance″ program, requires that we be open about this expectation and consider what it means.Should, for example, distribution to rural regions be financed not by city-dwellers, but by the government as a whole, rather than by individual taxpayers?

  • Should life-saving, expensive pharmaceuticals given by government programs be sent via trackable postal alternatives (with the government footing the expense) instead of traditional delivery methods?
  • The fact that paychecks are virtually exclusively direct deposited or given in person, and that Social Security payments are also almost entirely direct deposited in over 99 percent of situations, is not a significant point to raise.
  • And that’s a lot more significant and long-term concern than whether or not mail-in voting deadlines should be extended.
  • Two sides of the same coin are the fact that we appear to be painfully unable of having honest debates about Social Security, and that we also appear to be incapable of having a discussion about how much mail delivery truly costs, and who and how we should pay for it.
  • JaneTheActuary.com welcomes your comments, as is customary on the site.

Analysis

President Trump seems to have blurted out the actual reason he opposes expanding voting by mail in the 2020 election at a speech in March.According to him, the Democrats’ coronavirus stimulus bill contains provisions that would significantly increase funding for voting by mail, and if they were ever implemented, ″you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.″ He made the statement on Fox News, referring to the bill’s provisions that would significantly increase funding for voting by mail.He’s up to his old tricks again.On Thursday morning’s Fox Business Network, Trump appeared to reveal that he opposed Democrats’ planned financing for mail-in balloting and the United States Postal Service in order to make it more difficult to expand voting by mail.

As a result, he explained, ″They now want that money in order to make the post office operational so that it can handle all of these millions and millions of ballots.″ If they do not get those two items, ″universal mail-in voting″ will be impossible since they will not be able to participate because they will not be equipped to do so.Trump explains on Fox News why he would not finance the United States Postal Service.″Now they require that money in order to keep the post office operational so that it can handle the millions and millions of ballots that are being cast.″ However, if they do not receive those two elements, it will be impossible to implement universal mail-in voting.″ Abby D.Phillip (@abbydphillip) is a Twitter user.The 13th of August, 2020 Trump again referred to this notion during a press conference on Wednesday evening, adding that Democrats are now requesting $3.5 billion for universal mail-in voting as well as an additional $25 billion for the United States Postal Service, among other things.″They don’t have the financial means to participate in the universal mail-in voting.″ And as a result, I think they won’t be able to accomplish it,″ Trump stated.

″Do they intend to go through with it even if they don’t have the money?″ ″However, as a result, they don’t have it.″ he said.They don’t have the resources to participate in the universal mail-in voting.″ ″As a result, they are unable to participate in the universal mail-in vote.″ It’s a really straightforward process.″How are they going to accomplish it if they don’t have the money to do it?″ you might wonder.

  • Trump has maintained, as he did on Wednesday, that the United States Postal Service is untrustworthy and that mail-in ballots are prone to fraud — despite the fact that there is little evidence of widespread fraud.
  • Trump and the White House have frequently used dubious alleged proof in support of their claims, such as votes that were rejected for reasons unrelated to fraud and shaky statistics on voter registration numbers, among other things.
  • A generous interpretation of his remarks would indicate that he is claiming that the post office would be unable to handle anything as complex as universal mail-in voting, and that this is why he is opposed to giving it the opportunity.

That same charitable interpretation may be extended to his March remarks; perhaps he was simply stating that voter fraud would benefit Democrats rather than result in higher turnout!However, as was the case in March, Trump’s choice of language suggests something more political.Indeed, if you are so concerned about fraud and the Postal Service’s capacity to manage mail-in votes, wouldn’t more money be able to help relieve those issues?Couldn’t more funding help alleviate those issues?In addition, if your actual issue is about fraud, why would you point to ″levels of voting,″ which is to say, turnout, rather than the alleged fraud as a source of concern?Republicans have often said in recent years that this is about electoral gain rather than their concerns about fraud, and this has been reinforced by the media.

Republicans’ propensity to win elections has been seen as a benefit of voter identification by some.Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) indicated last year that Democrats’ plan to declare Election Day a federal holiday, which would obviously raise turnout, was ″a power grab that’s smelling more and more like precisely what it is.″ Interestingly, Larry Kudlow gave similar sentiments on what Democrats were asking for and why the Republican Party was opposed to it the same morning Trump made his remarks on Thursday.We don’t want voting rights, help to illegal immigrants, and other liberal left-wing wishlist items, so many of the Democratic demands are just that: wishlist items ″Kudlow made the statement.″″That’s not our style of play.″ In recent months, Trump has taken a strong interest in the Postal Service, appointing a loyalist to lead the organization.

  • The Democratic Party has said that he is doing this in order to limit the capacity of Americans to vote by mail.
  • Jacob Bogage of the Washington Post has written an excellent story on the ins and outs of what’s been going on there: Hours earlier, House Democrats stepped up their requests for more monitoring of the agency and its new postmaster general, Louis DeJoy, a prominent Republican fundraiser and close confidant of President Donald Trump.
  • Effort comes after DeJoy oversaw a comprehensive overhaul of the agency’s leadership ranks as well as the restructuring of operations and the imposition of a hiring freeze, on top of other cost-cutting initiatives that have previously been blamed for massive mail backlogs.
  • Over the weekend, two Democratic members of the House, Rep.
  • Peter A.

DeFazio (Ore.) and Rep.Alma Adams (N.C.), called for DeJoy’s removal from his position.Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Charles E.Schumer (D-N.Y.) has stated that the restrictions are impeding the completion of a ″Phase IV″ coronavirus relief package in the chamber.

Democrats’ concerns that President Donald Trump is using the nation’s mail service to aid his reelection campaign have been exacerbated in recent weeks by the Postal Service’s warning that long-standing classification practices for ballots and other political mailings may not be sufficient to ensure timely delivery of ballots and other political mailings for the November election.First-class postage, which costs 55 cents per item, was recommended by postal authorities to secretaries of state around the country for use on election mail rather than the third-class, or bulk, postage rate of 20 cents that was previously recommended.However, postal employees have traditionally considered election mail — including voter registration materials, voter information, and ballots — as first-class mail, allowing them to take advantage of benefits that their 20-cent price point would typically not enable them to take advantage.As a result of the USPS’s financial woes and DeJoy’s cost-cutting mandate, Democrats are concerned that the Postal Service may release new instructions for processing election mail.The Democratic caucuses in the Senate and the House of Representatives wrote to DeJoy on Wednesday, urging him not to modify election mail processing procedures.

  • President Donald Trump’s statements on Wednesday and Thursday will only serve to raise further questions about what is really going on.
  • As a result of all of this, it is reasonable to wonder what else Trump – and maybe his new postmaster general – are doing to achieve that aim.
  • There are a variety of different options available to you, some of which were mentioned in Bogage’s essay.
  1. Because Trump has made it quite plain that he would want to see mail-in voting suppressed, it will be much more difficult to establish that the Postal Service under DeJoy is acting in good faith.

Trump says he opposes funding USPS because of mail-in voting

(CNN) During a press conference on Thursday, President Donald Trump stated that he opposes much-needed financing for the United States Postal Service because he does not want the postal service to be utilized for mail-in voting in November.Donald Trump is fuelling charges that he is attempting to exploit the postal system for political benefit by explicitly connecting USPS money to mail-in voting, according to the Washington Post.While the epidemic has resulted in record-breaking numbers of voting-by-mail, President Donald Trump has attempted to restrict the mode of voting because he believes it would harm his reelection and the interests of Republicans across the board.On Fox News, Trump stated that if the United States Postal Service does not receive the additional $25 billion funding request that Democrats included in the ongoing stimulus discussions, the Post Office will be unable to manage the flood of mail-in ballots for the 2018 presidential election.

″They’re asking for three and a half billion dollars for something that will turn out to be bogus; it’s essentially election money in disguise.They are want three and a half billion dollars in exchange for mail-in ballots.Mail-in ballots that are available to everyone.Their demand for the Post Office is $25 billion, or billions of dollars.

This money is needed to get the Post Office back up and running so that it can handle all of the millions and thousands of ballots,″ Trump stated, continuing his erroneous assertions that mail-in voting will be ″fraudulent.″″

If they don’t obtain those two elements, ″you won’t be able to have universal mail-in voting because they aren’t equipped to do it,″ Trump said further.Trump has been railing against mail-in voting for months, claiming without evidence that it will result in voter fraud.Voter fraud is not prevalent in the United States, and neutral experts argue that when states extend access to mail-in voting, neither political party inevitably gains an advantage.

During an interview with MSNBC, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi reacted to Trump’s remarks by stating that the $25 billion for the United States Postal Service was recommended by the agency’s Board of Governors, not Democrats.According to Pelosi, ″a bipartisan Board of Governors, 100% appointed by Donald Trump, recommended a $25 billion dollar investment in the United States Postal Service,″ which is included in the legislation.″A bipartisan Board of Governors, 100 percent appointed by Donald Trump, recommended a $25 billion dollar investment in the United States Postal Service.″ Pelosi went on to say that in prior legislative proposals dealing with the coronavirus, ″the President has blocked any funding for the postal service.″ In a statement, the campaign of presumptive Democratic presidential contender Joe Biden referred to Trump’s remarks as a ″attack on our democratic process.″ Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates said in a statement that the president was sabotaging ″a basic service that hundreds of millions of people rely on, cutting a critical lifeline for rural economies and for the delivery of medicines, because he wants to deprive Americans of their fundamental right to vote safely during the most catastrophic public health crisis in over 100 years.″ Bates said the president was sabotaging ″a basic service that hundreds of millions of people rely on, cutting a critical lifeline for Republican Trump’s statements are ″voter suppression, plain and clear,″ according to Democratic Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, who said in a tweet that his comments are ″voting suppression, plain and simple.″ In prior statements, the President claimed that the United States Postal Service would be unable to manage the surge in mail-in ballots that will be delivered this year as a result of the coronavirus outbreak, a claim that has been refuted by the Postal Service.As a consequence of the Covid-19 outbreak, the Postal Service announced it had ″ample capacity″ to alter its countrywide processing and delivery network to match predicted Election and Political Mail load.

See also:  What Do I Do If My Package Was Stolen?

The attacks on the United States Postal Service, according to David Becker, executive director of the independent Center for Election Innovation and Research, impacted voters, including many of Trump’s own supporters who voted by mail.″He’s publicly urging his constituents to do so, but he’s doing them a disservice by rejecting bipartisan attempts to give enough financing to assure that all voters in those states, including his own, may vote by mail without experiencing difficulties,″ Becker explained.

Trump Says Gutting the Post Office ‘Means You Can’t Have Universal Mail-In Voting’

With regard to voting rights in our upcoming election year, President Donald Trump has a penchant of stating the silent part out loud, as if he were speaking for everyone.The following month, he tweeted that mail-in voting in 2020 will ″LEAVE OUR GREAT REPUBLICAN PARTY WITHOUT A FIGHT.″ Earlier this year, he told Politico that if the scores of lawsuits brought by his campaign and Republican supporters to block greater access to mail-in voting were unsuccessful, he would not seek reelection.″I believe that if we don’t win those lawsuits, the election will be jeopardized.″ President Donald Trump went even further in an appearance with Fox Business on Thursday morning.During his speech, he mentioned a proposed $25 billion in emergency assistance for the United States Postal Service – funding that Senate Republicans and the White House reject.

As Trump said, ″Now they need that money in order to make Post Office operate, so that it can take all of these millions and millions of ballots,″ he added.″However, if they don’t receive such materials, it implies that you won’t be able to have universal mail-in voting since they aren’t equipped to do so.″ Mail-in voting, commonly known as absentee voting, is a popular way of electing officials in both Democratic and Republican-controlled states.Voter fraud is extremely rare in mail-in voting, with only a few cases reported each year.Although the Trump administration has attacked mail-voting by spreading misinformation about fraud, installing a new Postmaster General who has scaled back delivery service, and opposing new federal funds for local election officials who must adjust their plans as a result of the Covid-19 crisis, mail-voting has remained popular.Trump’s attack on mail-in voting is overtly political, and it exposes his clear hypocrisy on the issue.His campaign is urging Republican voters in battleground areas to apply for absentee ballots and vote by mail at the same time he is attacking mail-in voting.

Several members of the government, including President Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, Attorney General William Barr, and others, have cast ballots by mail in recent elections.One explanation for Trump’s renewed opposition to voting by mail — to the point where he would hobble the Postal Service in order to impede the distribution and transport of votes — is that he feels it would harm his prospects of reelection in November in November.Mail-in voting was not invented during this epidemic, according to Janai Nelson, associate director-counsel at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, in a recent interview with Rolling Stone magazine.

  • ‘It is only when we witness the development of access to this quite practical instrument that we see the casting of ballots being exposed to such scrutiny and malignment,’ says a political scientist.

President Trump Blocks Postal Funding To Stop Mail Voting

  • After months of insinuation, President Donald Trump appeared to say outright on Thursday that his opposition to funding the U.S. Postal Service and additional election resources is part of a deliberate effort to make it more difficult for Americans to vote by mail in the November presidential election. When asked why the Post Office needed the money, the President said, ″They need that money in order to have the Post Office work so that it can take all of these millions and millions of ballots.″ The President made the remarks during an interview with Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business Network on Thursday. If they do not get those two items, ″universal mail-in voting″ will be impossible since they will not be able to participate because they will not be equipped to do so. ″Now, if we don’t come to an agreement, it means they won’t get the money,″ he said. That implies they will be unable to implement universal mail-in voting
  • they will simply be unable to do so.″ In the same meeting, Trump repeated the bogus assertion that an increase in mail-in voting will result in ″one of the worst frauds in history,″ which he has made in previous conversations. States with required postal voting, such as Oregon and Washington, have reported exceptionally low rates of voter fraud in their elections. The president’s remarks on Thursday were not made in a vacuum. In a press conference the day before, Trump said he had refused to sign off on an emergency financing proposal that included $25 billion for the Postal Service and $3.5 billion for election security. President Donald Trump discussed his intention to deny those funding during a phone interview with Fox News on Thursday. Trump also expressed his opposition to postal voting. ″It’s practically election money,″ he remarked after claiming that the financing will be used for ″something that will turn out to be fake″. Election experts and Democrats are concerned that the President’s words may cause people to lose confidence in the outcome of the November election. Biden, the presumed Democratic presidential candidate, told reporters on Thursday afternoon that Trump’s resistance to financing the Postal Service was ″pure Trump,″ and that ″he does not want an election.″ Biden also said that Trump ″does not want an election.″ Congressional Democrats have repeatedly sought increased financing for the Postal Service, which is on the verge of bankruptcy due in part to a decline in advertising mail during the COVID-19 epidemic, during the most recent round of coronavirus relief discussions. In contrast to what Trump stated, Democrats have not advocated a universal vote-by-mail plan. Almost every state, the vast majority of which are headed by Republicans, will allow some kind of postal voting in the upcoming election. Election authorities from both parties have aggressively urged voters to cast their ballots by mail in order to prevent getting or spreading COVID-19 during the continuing epidemic, which is now underway. This year, a record number of Americans are anticipated to cast ballots by the mail. The President’s words, according to election analysts, introduce unnecessarily political baggage into an already difficult scenario. ″The resources and support provided to the Post Office are not intended to facilitate the adoption of universal vote by mail.″ As Tammy Patrick, senior advisor at the Democracy Fund, explained, ″it’s about supporting voters’ rights to state laws in the states where they live, as well as their right to receive a ballot and return it through the mail in the face of a global pandemic.″ Patrick has advised many election officials on voting-by-mail. A partisan or political ploy to prevent or aid someone from voting in a specific way is not, and should not be, the focus of this investigation.″ I have a big problem with anyone who claims that they are withholding assistance because of political considerations.″ Republicans criticized the President’s statements at a time when Democrats have asked for greater monitoring of the new Postmaster General, Louis DeJoy, who was chosen by Trump in May. According to a CNN analysis of financial filings and ethics experts, DeJoy is a prominent Republican contributor who also has a multimillion-dollar investment in his former firm XPO Logistics, which is a USPS contractor, resulting in a significant conflict of interest for the senator and his campaign. While only in office for less than two months, DeJoy has already implemented sweeping reorganization of the United States Postal Service, which has resulted in a hiring freeze and other cost-cutting measures that postal workers claim are interfering with their ability to pick up and deliver mail on time. Mail pick-up and delivery delays, according to state election authorities, might make it difficult for the agency to distribute votes in time for the November general election. However, despite the fact that millions of Americans plan to vote by mail for the first time this year, Patrick maintains that the rise in the number of mail-in votes is not her major worry. According to her, the Postal Service processes over 180 million pieces of mail every day, so the rise in ballots is ″barely a blip on the radar screen.″ ‘We have built several procedures and processes throughout the years, in partnership with the Postal Service, to ensure that there is accountability and integrity in the vote by mail process,’ Patrick explains. It is whether or not those same policies will be met, acknowledged, and satisfied under the incoming Postmaster General that I am concerned about. Democrats from both the House and the Senate wrote to DeJoy this week to express their dissatisfaction with his decisions, which have already resulted in postal delays. In order for the Postal Service to be able to deliver mail in a timely and efficient manner, it is imperative that they do so. It is a matter of life and death for the Postal Service to operate smoothly during the once-in-a-century health and economic catastrophe of COVID-19, and its flawless operation is crucial for safeguarding lives, livelihoods, and the life of our American democracy, according to House legislators. It is deeply worried that you are enacting actions that will further exacerbate the problem at the Postal Service, such as instructing Post Offices to stop treating all election mail as First Class mail.″ If this policy is enforced now, as the election approaches, it would result in further delays in election mail, which will result in voters being disenfranchised and placing substantial financial strain on election authorities.″ Democrats encouraged DeJoy to ″prioritize the delivery of all electoral mail″ in a letter to the Senate, and they attacked his handling of the election. Instead of taking steps to improve your agency’s ability to deliver for the American people, you are implementing policy changes that are making matters worse, and the Postal Service is reportedly considering changes that would increase costs for states at a time when millions of Americans rely on voting by mail to exercise their right to vote, the group stated in their letter. In spite of the fact that the President has politicized postal voting by implying that only Democrats are embracing it, Patrick points out that if sent ballots are delayed or not prioritized, Republican turnout would almost certainly drop. Seniors and rural voters, who tend to vote Republican, have historically been the most inclined to cast ballots by mail in presidential elections. Republican voters have already inquired about the safety of voting by mail during the primary, after Trump’s criticism of the procedure, according to Patrick, and the number of inquiries is expected to grow if the assaults on the method continue. TIME Magazine has more must-read stories. Moldovans are concerned that they may become Putin’s next target. We’re still dealing with anti-AAPI prejudice one year after the Atlanta shootings because their prime minister is preparing for the worst.
  • Understanding the Fourth COVID-19 Vaccine Dose
  • What to Expect After a Fourth COVID-19 Vaccine Dose
  • Evan Rachel Wood, Marilyn Manson, and the Stories We Tell Ourselves About Iconoclastic Rock Stars
  • Evan Rachel Wood, Marilyn Manson, and the Stories We Tell Ourselves About Iconoclastic Rock Stars
  • As a result of fleeing Ukraine, LGBTQ refugees are seeking refuge in countries that are hostile to their rights.
  • The brutal treatment a Haitian man received from United States border agents sparked outrage. His story is being told now, and he says, ″It’s our home turf.″ The Man on the Front Lines of Ukraine’s Digital War

Write to Abigail Abrams at [email protected] She will respond as soon as possible.

Trump says he is refusing additional post office funding as part of his fight against mail-in voting

On Capitol Hill, President Donald Trump stated that discussions on more coronavirus relief funds have reached a standstill due in part to Democratic demands for billions of dollars to help the United States Postal Service and mail-in voting operations.According to Trump, who said in an interview with Fox Business on Thursday morning, ″They need that money in order to have the Post Office operate so that it can accept all of these million and millions of ballots.″ When those two elements are not obtained, ″universal mail-in voting″ cannot be implemented since the voting machines in question are not able to handle the task.″Unless we reach an agreement, they will not receive the funds, and they will not be able to implement universal mail-in voting as a result.They just can’t take it any longer ″Trump made the statement.

″It’s a bit of a bizarre phenomenon.It’s a fascinating read.″ On Capitol Hill, Trump was questioned about the specifics of what was causing a breakdown in communication between the White House and Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill.If a projected spike in mail-in ballots is permitted to take place, the president has frequently asserted that the 2020 election would be ″rigged″ and plagued with fraud.According to election experts, the assertions are untrue.When it comes to increased mail-in voting plans and the capabilities of the Postal Service to handle them, the president’s most recent statements indicate that he believes he can defeat such plans by refusing to pay those efforts with federal funds.Democrat are concerned that a raft of recent operational changes implemented by the new postmaster general, who also happens to be a significant donor to Republicans and Trump-supporting groups, would jeopardize the integrity of this year’s presidential election.

The postmaster general, Louis DeJoy, has been urged to reverse the broad modifications that have been accused by mail employees’ advocates for causing severe mail delays.Members of both political parties have called on him to do so.In an interview with CNBC, Mark Dimondstein, president of the American Postal Workers Union, stated that the union is receiving ″complaints across the board″ about a delay in mail delivery.

  • ″Anything that causes the mail to be delayed is the polar opposite of what the people of this country want and deserve,″ Dimondstein stated emphatically.
  • Democrats seek to add a $25 billion injection for the Post Office as part of their $3 trillion Covid-19 relief program, which would help the agency recover from the pandemic’s financial losses of billions of dollars.
  • As part of the stimulus package, $3.6 billion was set aside for election funding, which House Speaker Nancy Pelosi explained was intended to ensure that there are enough polling places, that they are spaced out, and that they are open for a long enough period of time to prevent the spread of the virus.

″It’s a problem with your health.According to Pelosi, ″you shouldn’t have to choose between your health and your capacity to vote,″ adding that Trump was ″undermining the health of our democracy.″ ″refusal to contribute money to absentee voting or the United States postal service Negotiations between Democratic leaders and the White House have come to a halt because the two sides are ″miles apart″ on an agreement for more disaster relief cash, according to Pelosi.As reported by the Fox Business Network, Trump’s statements extended on his previous claims that mail-in voting will be impossible if he does not authorize the funds.″They say that they want $3.5 billion and that they would not agree to a deal that is beneficial to the American people.As a result, they will not receive the $3.5 billion in compensation.As a result, they are unable to participate in the universal mail-in vote ″During a news meeting at the White House on Wednesday, Trump stated his position.

See also:  Where Is Zip Code 77044?

″It’s a really straightforward process.So, how are they going to get it done if they don’t have the funds to do it themselves?″ he explained.

A split over mail-in voting

Because of the ongoing coronavirus outbreak, many voters who would usually cast ballots in person are anticipated to stay away from polling places for fear of getting or spreading the disease, which has infected more than 5 million people and killed at least 164,000 people in the United States.State officials, for their part, have taken steps to broaden the availability of mail-in voting.According to a New York Times study, more than three-quarters of all voters in the United States will be allowed to vote by mail in the November election without giving an explanation, and a few of states are shipping ballots directly to households.Nevada is one of them, and it was sued by the Trump campaign and the Republican Party after its Democratic governor signed a bill into law that would have automatically distributed votes.

Democrat likely voters in battleground states indicate they are considerably more likely than Republicans to vote by mail in the 2016 presidential election, according to a new Change Research/CNBC poll of likely voters.The poll, which was conducted between Friday and Sunday and polled 2,701 probable battleground voters, indicated that 64 percent of Democrats anticipated to vote by mail, compared to just 14 percent of Republicans and 36 percent of Independents who answered the question.The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.9 percentage points, which is within the acceptable range.On Thursday, Trump urged Americans to cast their ballots in person, despite the fact that public health concerns existed.″You know, there’s nothing wrong with going out and voting,″ Trump said in an interview with Fox Business Network.In the past, President Donald Trump has minimized the severity of the coronavirus outbreak and has pressed states to immediately ease their severe lockdown restrictions, which were a contributing factor to an economic downturn earlier this year.

Recent efforts have focused on encouraging governors to reopen schools for in-person learning.He argues that children are at minimal risk of damage with Covid-19 and that virtual schooling is a poor substitute for traditional learning.However, despite the fact that some experts believe that postal ballots are more susceptible to fraud than traditional voting in a booth, incidents of voter fraud are extremely rare.

  • Trump, on the other hand, has argued without providing any proof that mail-in voting is extremely vulnerable to foreign interference — even tweeting in June that other countries will print ″millions″ of ballots that will be used in the 2020 election.
  • TRUMP TWEET – 2020 ELECTION IS FRAUDULENT: THE PRINTING OF MILLIONS OF MAIL-IN BALLOTS WILL BE DONE BY FOREIGN NATIONS AND OTHER COUNTRIES.
  • It will go down in history as THE SCANDAL OF OUR TIMES!

Congress pressures DeJoy

Members of Congress have criticized the Postal Service and DeJoy in particular as a result of Trump’s anti-mail-in voting rhetoric.DeJoy, 63, was picked in May by the United States Postal Service board of governors, which is comprised entirely of Trump appointees.According to the Associated Press, he is the only postmaster general in over two decades who has not been a career employee of the department.

He previously served as the CEO of a supply-chain logistics company.Since taking over as president of the United States Postal Service (USPS) in mid-June, DeJoy has begun adopting cost-cutting initiatives that he claims are meant to revitalize the struggling federal service.DeJoy said he is ″vigorously focused on the inherent inefficiencies in our operations″ during remarks at the Postal Service Board of Governors’ open session meeting last week.He emphasized that the Postal Service is on the verge of financial ruin unless ″dramatic″ reforms are implemented to its organizational structure.

Among the proposed changes is a crackdown on overtime and late trips for postal carriers, which would result in mail being kept behind in distribution facilities until the following day if carriers are unable to deliver it as part of their routine routes.During a meeting with DeJoy last week, Pelosi and Sen.Chuck Schumer, D-New York, claimed that DeJoy verified those and other revisions to them.As a result, according to the APWU’s Dimondstein, mail delivery is being slowed down.″It is not limited to a single location or a single occurrence.This has now become a widespread issue affecting the whole Post Office system ″Dimondstein made the statement.

More than 80 members of the House of Representatives, led by House Oversight Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney, D-New York, and Rep.Peter King, R-New York, signed a bipartisan letter last Thursday urging DeJoy to reverse the reported modifications.A letter from the Postal Service stated that ″millions of Americans rely largely on the postal service for the delivery of important commodities — including pharmaceuticals — particularly during the coronavirus epidemic.″ ″With the alleged operational changes taking place across the country, the capacity of unwell or at-risk people to receive their drugs on time is called into question, and this might have life-threatening consequences.″ On the following day, Maloney, along with Massachusetts Sen.Elizabeth Warren and seven other Democratic members of Congress, requested that USPS Inspector General Tammy Whitcomb undertake an audit into the modifications that were taking place under DeJoy’s supervision.″After first denying that these modifications were taking place, the Postal Service recently verified to employees that they were, in fact, taking place,″ according to the letter.″These changes endanger the well-being of millions of Americans who rely on the Postal Service for the delivery of Social Security checks, prescriptions, and other everyday mail of all kinds — and they appear to pose a potential threat to mail-in ballots and the 2020 general election,″ the report states.

  1. ″ DeJoy has been summoned to appear before Maloney’s committee on Sept.
  2. 17 to speak.
  3. She submitted a measure on Tuesday that would prevent the Postal Service from making any of the stated operational modifications ″until the COVID-19 outbreak has been brought to a conclusion.″ In a second letter, written on Wednesday, she and Pelosi, as well as 173 other House Democrats, asked on DeJoy to rescind his new regulations, which he refused to do.
  4. As DeJoy asserted last week, ″While there will certainly be an unprecedented surge in election mail volume as a result of the outbreak, the Postal Service has the capacity to deliver all election mail safely and on time in line with our service standards, and we intend to do so.″ He also disputed that his ″excellent connection″ with Trump was having an impact on his judgments.
  5. According to him, ″the concept that I would ever make judgments involving the Postal Service at the direction of the President, or anybody else in the administration, is completely erroneous.″ On Wednesday, Trump lauded DeJoy while criticizing the United States Postal Service for previous incompetence.
  1. ″The new man — who is a wonderful person and a brilliant businessman — has just recently arrived at the company.
  2. For many, many decades, the United States Postal Service has been operated inefficiently ″Trump made the statement.

Why Trump’s attack on USPS is an attack on the Constitution, democracy, and racial equality

President Donald Trump’s plan to demolish the United States Postal Service (USPS) in order to prevent people from voting by mail is not only an attack on fair and equal voting and the democratic process, but it is also an attack on the democratic process itself.It is also an attack on the Constitution, on veterans of the United States military, and on racial equality.″They want 25 billion dollars—a billion dollars—for the post office,″ Trump added.

Now, they require that money in order to ensure that the post office is operational and capable of handling all of the millions and millions of ballots that will be cast.The problem is that, if they don’t have those two elements, you won’t be able to have universal mail-in voting because they aren’t suited for it.Despite political posturing on Capitol Hill, the request for cash is really coming from the United States Postal Service (USPS) as well as certain political appointees who were appointed by President Donald Trump.Additionally, the request comes from the general people in the United States.

More than 75% of Republicans and Democrats support the use of COVID-19 stimulus funds for the United States Postal Service.The United States Postal Service (USPS) has an approval rating of over 90 percent among Americans, the highest of any government service.What Trump and other opponents of the USPS appear to be overlooking is the fact that persons with disabilities and senior citizens would be unable to obtain timely medical medicines as a result of the shutdown.They are forgetting about the rural Americans who will be unable to do business because they will not get mail, as well as the correspondence from loved ones, which will be crucial for mental and emotional well-being during a worldwide pandemic.However, there is more to it than that.Rural America, including American Indian reservations, will essentially come to a halt as a result of this.

The United States Postal Agency (USPS) is the only mail delivery service that delivers to every address in the country.Americans are well aware of the significance of the United States Postal Service.There will also have a negative influence on the jobs of thousands of postal workers.Military veterans and/or persons of color make up a considerable proportion of the workforce of the United States Postal Service.Veterans account for about 20% (or more than 100,000) of all USPS employees.Veterans are employed at a rate three times higher than the general population of the United States.

  1. More over a quarter of USPS employees are African-American.
  2. Furthermore, many are both Black and veterans.
  3. Approximately one in every six USPS employees is either Latino or Asian in origin.
  4. More than a third of USPS employees in western states, including California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Hawaii, are either Latino or Asian in ethnicity, according to the USPS.
  5. The USPS is also seeing an increase in the number of female employees (40 percent ).
  1. It’s vital to take a short look back in time here: As servicemen returned from World War II and Vietnam, the United States Postal Service (USPS) provided a path to the middle class for them.
  2. This was especially true for Black soldiers, who were routinely denied access to educational and professional opportunities that would allow them to realize their American Dream.
  3. Attacking the United States Postal Service is, in this way, an insult to the quest of racial equality.
  4. It should be noted, however, that this is not an isolated historical phenomena.

The United States Postal Service employs a significant number of veterans from Middle Eastern wars.Furthermore, the United States Postal Service is not bipartisan; it is nonpartisan.Trump, on the other hand, wants to change that.Donald Trump appointed Louis DeJoy to be the next Postmaster General earlier this year, despite concerns about a potential conflict of interest.With Michael Cohen and Elliot Broidy, DeJoy is serving as the local finance chairperson for the 2020 Republican National Convention.He previously served as one of the deputy finance chairmen for the 2017 Republican National Committee.

  • He is also a big fundraiser to President Trump and other Republican candidates for president.
  • DeJoy’s firm, which he ran as a private CEO, had a 25-year contract with the United States Postal Service.
  • He, on the other hand, has no prior government experience in this sort of position.
  • Since taking office in May, DeJoy has implemented significant reforms within the United States Postal Service, with the declared objective of making the organization more economically sound.
  • Critics, on the other hand, claim that these changes would cause mail to be delayed and will have a direct influence on the November 2020 presidential election, in which mail-in balloting will be at an all-time high.
  • It’s possible that the critics are correct.
  1. There have been complaints of significant postal delays between Washington, D.C.
  2. and Washington state.
  3. DeJoy stated in a recent Senate hearing that he will put a halt to any more changes to the United States Postal Service until after the election.

Although it is true that the United States Postal Service does not make a profit, the majority of the agency’s financial shortfall may be traced to a 2006 reform that required the service to prepay the pensions of future retirees.As a result of financial difficulties, the United States Postal Service has reduced the number of full-time, benefited employees from over 750,000 in the mid-1990s to less than 500,000 now.The United States Postal Service (USPS) has similarly set a goal of reducing its physical footprint in order to decrease expenses.Over the previous two decades, the number of USPS facilities has declined by around 10%, to less than 35,000.However, the annual expansion of around one million post office boxes makes this decrease difficult to achieve.

  • For those who choose to draw the erroneous comparison between the USPS and private enterprises, the postal service would rank in the top 50 of private companies in terms of revenue.
  • Twenty percent of Americans still pay their bills via mail, with the elderly and those living in rural areas of the country accounting for the majority of this figure.
  • An even greater proportion of the tithes and offerings received by churches come via the mail.

This is especially true in the event of a worldwide pandemic outbreak.In contrast, the rise of digital mail and delivery firms such as Amazon, FedEx, and UPS has resulted in a 20 percent decline in USPS mail volume over the previous decade.Deals with these private mail delivery businesses, on the other hand, account for a significant portion of the USPS’s revenue.

All in all, all of the debate over the United States Postal Service’s budgetary accountability is irrelevant, according to the Constitution.Simply put, the United States Postal Service (USPS) should not be regarded as a victim of financial inefficiencies so much as it should be regarded as a constitutional public good—a public service—that is necessary for democratic functioning and deserves adequate funding to ensure that it can fully serve the American people in its current form.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.